|
 |
Forum |
|
Blow your Mind |
Posted by Blur on Jan 28, 2004 |
I have just recently finished reading a book called "A hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" Now I ahve only joined this Wolfshack recently so this Book link here on this site might have already faciliated information on this book.. But after reading a few posts byt the pople that look a this site, I think this book would be loved by many. It's tough to but down, and to fall asleep after reading.
Peace |
Okay. |
Posted by phduffy on Jan 28, 2004 |
I've never actually read that, but I've heard all kinds of good things about it.
Sounds like they were right. I'll have to pick that up sometime in the future. |
The series |
Posted by Nerhael on Jan 28, 2004 |
I had the big book. The one that combines all 5 together. I think I got to the middle of the fourth when I finally got bored of it. First 2-3 of the series are great. Beyond that, feels redundant. |
a |
Posted by phduffy on Apr 01, 2004 |
Redundant is a fun word.
I sort of feel like I screwed up by putting all 6 of these reviews in one.
It sort of loses the point that:
Liar's Poker is a great book that everyone should read.
(I just read another book by Michael Lewis, Next, which deals with the internet, and which is also great)
and
Use of Weapons is a great book that anyone that likes Iain M. Banks should read. |
How... |
Posted by Nerhael on Apr 01, 2004 |
the hell do you find a thread that's like 2 months old and think to post to it again? You've been doing this a lot lately. :) |
a |
Posted by phduffy on Apr 01, 2004 |
On the left, below where it says articles, you can click on a category.
Then, you get a page with all the articles in that category, no matter how old they are! |
Mechanics |
Posted by Nerhael on Apr 01, 2004 |
I'm aware of the mechanics, I'm just surprised that you're looking at old ones, or do you just remember old ones that have that thread of conversation, and look them up? |
Right |
Posted by phduffy on Apr 04, 2004 |
I just remember after writing this review that I wasn't totally happy with it, cause I didn't get across how good Liar's Poker is.
So I was going to do a review of another Michael Lewis book and mention it there, but I got lazy, so I just went back to the old review and put it in the comments. |
|
|
|
 |